Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Charles Broom vs Ryan Shane Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Broom vs Shane analysis and find out who is favored!
Charles Broom vs Ryan Shane Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Broom 2 - 0 Shane
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Broom has won 51.56% of points on their second serve, while Shane has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Broom, in recent form, has won 56.36% of their opponent's second serve points, while Shane has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 31.24% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Broom has saved 64.43% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Shane has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Broom has won 63.1% of matches played (W/L 53/ 31), with Shane winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Broom has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 67% (W/L 44/ 22), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 59% (W/L 52/ 36). Shane has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 63% (W/L 52/ 31), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 48% (W/L 15/ 16).
- Player level: In the last year, Broom has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 68.89% of matches (W/L 31/ 14), where as Shane has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Broom winning 2 times and Shane being victorious 0 times. They have played 4 sets in total, with Broom winning 4 and Shane winning 0. The last match between Broom and Shane was at the M15 Ithaca, 07-10-2021, Second, I.hard with Charles Broom getting the victory 6-4 4-1 ret..
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:49:30.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Broom and Shane have played a deciding set 0 times, with Broom winning 0 times and Shane 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Broom winning 1, and Shane 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Broom has played against opponents with an average rank of 232.96 while Shane has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Broom has won 59% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Shane has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Broom has converted 37.63% of breakpoint opportunities, and Shane has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
283
Rank
283
High
26
Age
R
Plays
2
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
1
Indoor0
0
Grass0
897
Rank
333
High
30
Age
R
Plays
W
W
W
L
W
L
L
W
W
W
Form
L
L
W
L
W
W
W
W
W
L
64% (209-120)
Career Total W/L
54% (132-112)
63% (24-14)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$36,000
Career Prize Money
$17,295
1
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Charles Broom vs Ryan Shane For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Broom VS Shane
Sportsbook
Offer
| stats | Charles Broom | Ryan Shane |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 2 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 4 | 0 |
| Games Won | 23 | 14 |
| Aces (Total) | 4 | 15 |
| DFs (Total) | 7 | 16 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:49:30 | 1:49:30 |
| 1st Serve % | 65% (89/137) | 55% (79/143) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 73% (65/89) | 70% (55/79) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 50% (24/48) | 45% (29/64) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 38% (5/13) | 11% (1/9) |
| Return Points W% | 41% (59/143) | 35% (48/137) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (2/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (2/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 4-1 ret. |
Stats 
Charles Broom
Player
Ryan Shane
67%
(
36 of
54)
1st Serve %
59%
(
39 of
66)
2
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
8
67%
(
24 of
36)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
37%
(
20 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
30 of
66)
64
Total Points Won
56
|
||||
| 7-6(8) 6-3 |
Stats
Charles Broom
Player
Ryan Shane
64%
(
53 of
83)
1st Serve %
52%
(
40 of
77)
2
Aces
10
4
Double Faults
8
77%
(
41 of
53)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
32 of
40)
47%
(
14 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
34%
(
28 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
29 of
77)
84
Total Points Won
76
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Charles Broom | Ryan Shane |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 63% (24/14) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 59% (54/37) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 53% (457/412) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 67% (14/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 54% (7/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 75% (3/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.56 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 239 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.21 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 88 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:50:15 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 222.03 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 64% (1741/2706) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 71% (1233/1741) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 52% (497/965) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 38% (117/307) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 41% (1198/2934) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 53% (9/8) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 71% (15/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 63% (24/38) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 58% (7/12) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 60% (9/15) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 86% (21/18) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 14% (21/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 35% (17/6) | 0% (0/0) |
Charles Broom Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 | 6-7(9) 6-4 6-2 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Charles Broom
Player
Blake Ellis
63%
(
41 of
65)
1st Serve %
61%
(
36 of
59)
8
Aces
11
0
Double Faults
5
78%
(
32 of
41)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
27 of
36)
42%
(
10 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
35%
(
23 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
24 of
59)
66
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Charles Broom
Player
Harry Wendelken
74%
(
37 of
50)
1st Serve %
57%
(
41 of
72)
8
Aces
7
0
Double Faults
2
81%
(
30 of
37)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
38%
(
5 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
15 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
35 of
72)
70
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Paul Jubb
Player
Charles Broom
53%
(
35 of
66)
1st Serve %
61%
(
37 of
61)
2
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
2
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
52%
(
16 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
35%
(
23 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
29 of
61)
72
Total Points Won
55
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Daniil Glinka
Player
Charles Broom
61%
(
31 of
51)
1st Serve %
60%
(
26 of
43)
5
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
94%
(
29 of
31)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
16 of
26)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
10 of
17)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
25%
(
13 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
17 of
43)
55
Total Points Won
39
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Charles Broom
Player
Roberto Cid Subervi
67%
(
39 of
58)
1st Serve %
60%
(
34 of
57)
11
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
82%
(
32 of
39)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
23 of
34)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
29%
(
17 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
26 of
57)
67
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Blake Mott
Player
Charles Broom
60%
(
49 of
82)
1st Serve %
60%
(
52 of
86)
2
Aces
5
6
Double Faults
2
73%
(
36 of
49)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
37 of
52)
45%
(
15 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
38%
(
31 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
33 of
86)
84
Total Points Won
84
|
6-3 1-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Charles Broom
Player
Henry Searle
70%
(
33 of
47)
1st Serve %
62%
(
44 of
71)
4
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
28%
(
13 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
34 of
71)
68
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Charles Broom
Player
Blake Mott
73%
(
38 of
52)
1st Serve %
73%
(
43 of
59)
4
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
66%
(
25 of
38)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
23 of
43)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
37%
(
19 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
31 of
59)
64
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Charles Broom
Player
Robert Strombachs
60%
(
39 of
65)
1st Serve %
77%
(
48 of
62)
3
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
1
79%
(
31 of
39)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
31 of
48)
46%
(
12 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
34%
(
22 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
26 of
62)
69
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Ryan Shane Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
William Grant
Player
Ryan Shane
61%
(
17 of
28)
1st Serve %
55%
(
12 of
22)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
76%
(
13 of
17)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
8 of
12)
45%
(
5 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
36%
(
10 of
28)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
29
Total Points Won
21
|
6-3 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ryan Shane
Player
Ricardo Rodriguez-Pace
60%
(
45 of
75)
1st Serve %
70%
(
58 of
83)
10
Aces
8
6
Double Faults
2
78%
(
35 of
45)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
39 of
58)
47%
(
14 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
26 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
35 of
83)
84
Total Points Won
74
|
3-6 6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ryan Shane
Player
Leanid Boika
51%
(
35 of
68)
1st Serve %
33%
(
16 of
49)
8
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
7
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
11 of
16)
42%
(
14 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
10 of
33)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
43%
(
29 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
28 of
49)
67
Total Points Won
50
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF | w/o | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Ryan Shane
Player
Felix Corwin
54%
(
56 of
104)
1st Serve %
53%
(
55 of
103)
12
Aces
4
13
Double Faults
9
79%
(
44 of
56)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
40 of
55)
35%
(
17 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
15 of
48)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
41%
(
43 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
48 of
103)
109
Total Points Won
98
|
7-5 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ryan Shane
Player
Shuichi Sekiguchi
54%
(
32 of
59)
1st Serve %
52%
(
26 of
50)
8
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
1
84%
(
27 of
32)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
18 of
26)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
29%
(
17 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
21 of
50)
63
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ryan Shane
Player
Justin Roberts
57%
(
38 of
67)
1st Serve %
54%
(
42 of
78)
6
Aces
1
13
Double Faults
10
87%
(
33 of
38)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
28 of
42)
38%
(
11 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
14 of
36)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
34%
(
23 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
36 of
78)
80
Total Points Won
65
|
7-6(4) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Denis Yevseyev
Player
Ryan Shane
65%
(
47 of
72)
1st Serve %
63%
(
42 of
67)
3
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
9
70%
(
33 of
47)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
23 of
42)
40%
(
10 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
40%
(
29 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
33 of
67)
76
Total Points Won
63
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ryan Shane
Player
Taha Baadi
61%
(
38 of
62)
1st Serve %
59%
(
34 of
58)
10
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
2
79%
(
30 of
38)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
25 of
34)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
29%
(
18 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
24 of
58)
68
Total Points Won
52
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Fnu Nidunjianzan
Player
Ryan Shane
62%
(
38 of
61)
1st Serve %
50%
(
21 of
42)
2
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
5
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
16 of
21)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
31%
(
19 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
16 of
42)
58
Total Points Won
45
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Broom Vs Shane Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Broom are available here and Shane photos here.
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Charles Broom
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
